Explore blog

October 23, 2009

Coming soon…

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , — caren80 @ 10:23 pm

…just maybe, some stuff about photography instead of a big old blank space. I’ve moved to a new town, and still no developing facilities and frankly, I’m happy to leave it to other people for now.

Instead, it is project time. Has taken a while to bring this together, but it is more or less there (as in the idea, not yet the full execution), and project means ‘theme, relevance and aspects’ rather than just ‘collection’. I think so far, it has mostly been ‘collection’. Anyway, this time I’m interested in how people see hills, even particular hills. And, estuaries. Got any hills or estuaries near you? Got any experiences you can tell me about? I promise not to say it was me.

I grew up near an estuary, and it took ages before the realisation of how much life was in it gradually dawned on me. Those hordes of different shorebirds feeding there, well everyone had that, didn’t they? Er, no, they didn’t. Can’t remember when, but there was a solar eclipse one day, maybe in the mid-nineties (I’ll look it up in a minute) and I went along the path by the estuary to see it. There were other people dotted about, but not that many at all. I sat there with my bike, and waited. It was like when you look and look for a change in something, and then decide that it will happen so slowly that you won’t notice it anyway so why bother, and soon I was thinking of something else when I noticed that the sounds had changed – all the birds which were usually rustling and plodding about in the mud, making their curlew and redshank calls, and ‘chattering’ away, were quietening. And then I could see, without looking up, that the light was seeping away, leaching out of the scene like water from sand, and that the contrast and brightness were fading out of everything. It could have been terrifying, perhaps before science (and maybe , centuries ago, before the papers and the news and the internet were a twinkle in some mogul’s eye.

And looking up you could then see that a perfectly concave section, a mathematical curve, was being steadily removed from the sun, until finally the darkness was momentarily complete, like a creation story re-enactment. I remember that the birds ‘woke up’, convinced it was the day starting again, and the twittering resumed.

Any hill or estuary moments to share? Big or small. I’d love to hear ‘em.

July 29, 2008

where the lost time goes

Filed under: Uncategorized — caren80 @ 7:40 am



where the lost time goes

Originally uploaded by cedar_9

July 19, 2008

salt grasslands

Filed under: film, learning, photography, pinhole — Tags: , , , — caren80 @ 5:59 pm


salt grasslands

Originally uploaded by cedar_9

I took this on immensly cheap colour 35mm film, and did not develop it myself. It is a pinhole shot which overlaps a bit. I thought anything very close to the pinhole would still be in focus, as the detail further away is. I guess the nearness means any shake by either the grasses or by me produces a relatively big movement of light across the film plane, while further away objects do not….so similar to Darren C.’s shot below. Interesting.

July 14, 2008

Ways of depicting time

Filed under: cameraless, film, image, learning, photography, pinhole, time — caren80 @ 7:41 pm

I have a problem with it, besides the obvious (partially). Making images about time is one of those things that can get so blatant, so superficial that your viewing public (and your own imagination) packs up and goes to watch telly instead. It’s not like I’ve cracked it, you understand, I’m just thinking it through.

There has to be something more that just the equipment of measuring time involved, something which implies or suggests something more – like f/1.4’s image below. The measuring equipment isn’t just measuring equipment, it’s a forgotten remnant of a past age, buried in the snow of God knows how many winters. There’s ‘immediate’ time, seasonal time, eras. Audience gripped, concept established fully.

And it’s pinhole; just the most basic of physics, light and the time the energy takes to register on whatever surface you have. Anything from a few seconds to six months – technology and symbolism combined. This one took two months http://www.flickr.com/photos/sengstrom/234995738/ and this one six months (and more detail) http://www2.uiah.fi/~ttrygg/project.html …and for these images, the measuring equipment has gone. Is that like portraits without the person actually in them?

When I posted this long ago, someone said they felt that pinhole cams play with time, and made recent past look nostalgically like revered past. They implied that the technology does this, rather than the length of time itself. This is different again from recording the passage of time; it’s placing it in a context, which might be nothing to do with the actual time it was taken. f/1.4’s image seems to me to cover recent eras, but set in the future, and although it’s pinhole it doesn’t suggest distant past, which is in keeping with the meaning entirely (as I read it anyway). But unless he has a handy time machine which he is about to patent and become a squillionnaire, I’d say that’s not really the case. It’s carefully set up, carefully positioned.

For depicting time:

You can change technology to add visual context, and through that you can place your image in time and add personal context.

You can cover personal context by splicing yourself with an image of ‘personal distant memory’, using ancient looking and distorted pinhole technology (I saw it here http://flickr.com/photos/25667683@N04/2413886771/ ).

You can risk making it more obscure by removing some of the most familiar cues to the subject (clockfaces) or by making the image less familiar – less straightforward, more distorted and unsettled.

You can try and link short actual time to longer perceptions of time – a personal second seeming to last an hour.

Buildings. People moving and leaving ghostly images (though it’s been done, need something new). Countryside without buildings visible? A bit too empty.

More to come.

Pictures about time ‘Pinhole Dusk’

Filed under: Uncategorized — caren80 @ 6:03 pm



Pinhole Dusk

Originally uploaded by Darren C.

Still not by me, this one by Darren C. (flickr again). The exposure captures a minute, and the most obvious movements that happen in it, according to the change of position of the car in relation to the camera. You can see how much ‘brighter’ the light trails appear on the left, where the light from the car doesn’t move across the film surface so much. I might not go to work any more, I might just stay here and look at pinholes….

Images about time ‘The Clocks’

Filed under: photography, time — caren80 @ 5:53 pm


The Clocks

Originally uploaded by f/1.4

This beautiful image is not by me, it’s by flickrite f/1.4. How do you depict time, and the scale of it; human lifetimes, or geological? I love this idea, and also the other thoughts he mentions in the write up. Check out the ‘artefacts of an uncertain origin’ set.

July 12, 2008

Daci links – everything I can find, besides Flickr info.

Filed under: Uncategorized — caren80 @ 6:12 pm

Tricky as ‘Daci’ covers some kind of fruit fly parasite as well as a general (?) in the Albanian army, inhabitants of an ancient city near the Black Sea in and something to do with music. I’m not sure how to make these active links. But here:

http://www.lyndrup.dk/ken/Engelsk/Dacora%20E/Daci%20Royal%20E.htm

http://www.lyndrup.dk/ken/Engelsk/Dacora%20E.htm

Brief listings for Dacora

http://www.camerapedia.org/wiki/Daci_Royal

Daci Royal on Camarapedia

July 11, 2008

Green Daci Royal development disaster

Filed under: Uncategorized — caren80 @ 10:59 am


green daci001

Originally uploaded by cedar_9

The camera works just fine, but see previous post for details of ‘disaster’. Or ‘learning experience’ as it is termed these days! Not that I’m cynical or anything. This is my favourite shot of both rolls.

July 3, 2008

Photograms #2

Filed under: Uncategorized — caren80 @ 8:36 pm

I’ve been working on some of these. Basically you put an opaque or partially opaque object on a bit of photographic paper (or whatever else you can make light sensitive, I guess) and then shine some light on it. And then you develop the paper. I started off writing about them here http://caren80.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/27/.

So it was going well, and I particularly liked the one I posted here. I’ve learned to try and keep exactly the right dilutions of chemicals and exactly the same development, wash and fix time for every run, so I can tell what difference it makes if I shorten or lengthen the light time. I’ve been taping myself in (and had to repaint the doorframe a bit when detaping also) and using the safelight without the red cover, basically uncovering it and switching it on for the briefest time I can manually; not a very exact science. Unsurprisingly the results aren’t very subtley controllable, so I’ve got a weaker bulb and that’s next, perhaps until I get a cheap enlarger where you can time it.

So I did another run to try and refine the process a bit and get it further towards what I wanted, which was something a lot older and early photographic looking (surprise, I know). I wanted diffuse light and ‘depth of field’, something where the object mattered as much as the process to make the whole image, now I was better at home developing. Here’s the result.

The first one was madeless sharp and more misted by the use of highly expensive and specialised equipment to lessen the impact of the light rays, namely a bit of toilet roll. This is much more what I wanted, something more ghostly and reminding me a bit of luminescence. Howver it’s too faint, and I had to boost the contrast a few points in photoshop, and also I hadn’t fixed it for long enough and it faded a bit in the sunlight. I fixed for about two mins, which I thought was fine for paper, and then stuck it in the window for a week to see what happened (faded); perhaps i’m expecting too much.

Anyway this next one is a double exposure, very random but eventually managed to expose for two short enough periods. I’ve seen doubles like this, with the texture, before, it’s not my invention. Potential though, and also for texutre and multiple exposure to take a whole new line.

July 1, 2008

Current exploration

Filed under: Uncategorized — caren80 @ 6:21 pm

I have remnamed my blog so it sounds less like a swanky wine bar in Soho, and more like something I’d actually write myself.

Been away for a bit, and a lot has happened.

1. I bought (and sold) an Olympus Trip 35, which was excellent for multiple exposures and extremely cheap. I bought a Pilot 6, a camera shortly to have a blog entry of it’s very own. My polaroids became significantly closer to the dole queue with the closure of polaroid film making operations. I bought an Agat18 half-frame camera and am about to hack it (thanks to instructions from seriykotik1970). A friend gave me a Daci, a fabulous camera for movment and multiple exposures, and I’ve bought two more Dacis to go with it, though they may not stay long).

Ancient Pilot 6 SLR.

2. I made some photograms. I can still make them in the bathroom and either invert them in PS or contact print them, and the plant ones are interesting especially if you layer them.

3. I developed some of my own black and white film, for the first time, and oddly enough it didn’t turn out poerfectly. More to come.

I can’t decide what to do first and keep being distracted by other things requiring attention, like going to work and so on, but basically when it happens it’s going to get written about here.

Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.