Explore blog

October 28, 2007

crocodile city

Filed under: blurring, image, paper negative, photography, pinhole — caren80 @ 8:35 am

crocodile city, originally uploaded by cath9.

An ‘internal landscape’ shot, perhaps. More dark, gritty, smoky cities, looking distinctly post-apocalyptic. Really I exposed it for too long, but this brooding, settling, expectant atmosphere as a result is worth it. Pinhole shot from third floor of car park.

October 20, 2007

Coburn moonlight

Filed under: art, film, history, image, learning, photographer, photography — caren80 @ 8:09 pm

From here (scroll down). Some current context.

from London

Filed under: art, film, history, image, learning, photographer, photography — caren80 @ 7:53 pm

from London, Alvin Langdon Coburn

Think of the damp, dreary banks of the Thames on a clouded Autumn workday. Same then as it is now.

October 19, 2007

Further on Alvin Langdon Coburn

Filed under: art, film, history, image, learning, photographer, photography — caren80 @ 9:44 am

St. Pauls (around 1909) 

 I went back for another look at Alvin, because I found the above picture in a book, and that’s the one of his I liked origionally. There’s the gloomy, gritty London from before, with the smog and the people (surely that isn’t a ‘crowd’!!) going about their lives; and there’s the enclosing border and the buidings growing transparent like angular leaf prints, and that steam in the corner which to my mind lifts you above the city, and takes you into the air. I’ll not go over the nostalgia discussion again but several things spring to mind – there’s the quality of life down there, the transition of a city through time (I forget when they started to build the Tube, perhaps not quite yet), and (from prior knowledge of Coburn) the ephemeral nature of that steam, the spiritual or religious dimension for the viewer.

I don’t know much about this time in the history of photography, or about Coburn come to that, and this is my inexpert attempt to get it together.

Alvin Langdon Coburn





Last time I read that he was a ‘leading member of the international pictorialist movement, which had considerable influence over the status of photography as an art-form during the first quarter of the twentieth century’. (Note – layout may be a bit odd from now on, can’t figure out how to fix it though. Not to worry).

Pictorialism (1895 – 1910ish) was about moving images on from what’s literally right in front of the camera, and making them more painterly, about showing ‘personal artistic expression’ (Encyclopedia Britannica responsible for that), and about the overall impact on the viewer. Emotional impressions.  It used different types of printing, altering focus, and manipulating the negative during development – more experimental procedures, and pushing the boundaries.

A historical context for all this can be found here at the Timeline of Art History from the Metropolitan Museum of Art (this one is about the UK, and you can change it to get ones closer to your own interests. Annoyingly, you can’t do more than a single country at once by the looks of it). A more general timeline of art history is below:

PRE-MODERN 1800 – 1880 AD (CE)
Neo-Classicism 1750 – 1880 AD
(USA: Federal/Greek Revival)
(Canada: Georgian Style)
Romanticism 1800 – 1880 AD
(Canada: Victorian)
Realism 1830’s – 1850’s AD
Impressionism 1870’s – 1890’s AD

MODERNISM 1880 – 1945 AD (CE)
Post Impressionism 1880 – 1900 AD
Expressionism 1900 – 1920 AD
Fauvism 1900 – 1920 AD
Cubism 1907 – 1914 AD
Dada 1916 – 1922 AD
Bauhaus 1920s – 1940’s AD
Harlem Renaissance 1920s – 1940’s AD
Surrealism 1924 1920s – 1940’s AD
International Style 1920s – 1940’s AD

MODERN & POST-MODERN 1945 AD – Present (CE)
Abstract Expressionism 1945 – 1960 AD
Op Art 1960s AD
Pop Art 1960s AD
Minimal Art 1960s AD
New Realism 1970s – 1980s AD
Conceptual Art 1970s – 1980s AD
Performance Art 1970s – 1980s AD
Neo-Expressionism 1980s – 1990s AD
Computer Art 1980s – 1990s AD
Post-Modern Classicism 1980s – 1990s AD
Victorian Revival 1980s – 1990s AD

Coburn was born just as Pictorialism would have been kicking off, and he was doing some most innovative work by the end of the century. Pictorialism was still happening, and perhaps already declining as Modernism (see timeline above) became more influential.  

Alvin Langdon Coburn - 'Octopus' 
Prior to this, Expressionism had distorted images of reality in painting to make them more representative of the artists’ inner feelings about what they were seeing (it was apparently also quite mystical at times, and this element, while emerging before his birth, would be right up Coburns’ street, as he took less photographs in later life and concentrated on astrology and the occult instead).
A post-impressionist Van Gogh 
Post- Impressionism (1880 – 1900ish) then arrived. Here artists took it further, wanting a more interesting subject matter and more structure in their paintings. Some became more spiritual or used further symbolism, they used more adventurous brushstrokes and colours, moved away from a nature-based subject matter, or used more basic shapes. It was a very creative, innovative time, and the breaking away from nature seems to me a very large step away from the paintings of the past, Expressionist or before.
Geoffrey Lang 
On the photographic side, the gelatine process (or ‘dry plate’ process had been introduced by RL Maddox in 1871, with the first dry plate factory appearing in 1879. So on the physical side, taking photographs had just become more stable and durable – still complicated but more durable and with a surface that was more light sensitive. 

So Coburn is getting into his stride exactly when these inventive and experimental times  are happening in both art and photography.  Everywhere says that he was a mainstay of the ‘avant-garde’, and it was clearly the perfect time to be a talented, restless avant-garde photographer – everything was ready to go.

Aside from the pictures above, this is what he did:

Alvin Langdon Coburn - 'Eagle' vortograph 

 ‘Coburn passionately believed in liberating photography from the notion that it is only artistic if it depicted reality, and he is perhaps best known for producing Vortographs, non-objective photographs of such items as a piece of wood or crystal, through an arrangement of mirrors, resulting in multiple images.

In 1916 Coburn designed an item the poet Ezra Pound called a Vortoscope, which consisted of three mirrors arranged like a kaleidoscope, which enabled multiple-image photographs to be taken.

The British Journal of Photography (16 February 1917) comments on Coburn’s fascination for his vortographs, and his assertion that the creating of these “was the most thrilling experience he had ever had in all the realms of photography. For over a quarter of a century he had been using a camera in one way or another, but never had he discovered a medium to compare with vortography for producing aesthetic excitement and enjoyment.”

Between 1903-1909 his work appeared in three editions of Camera Work. Unfortunately Coburn lost himself in astrology and the occult, and his enthusiasm for photography waned somewhat after the first world war, though he again began taking photographs in the 1950s. ‘

From ‘A History of Photography, by Robert Leggat: Coburn, Alvin Langdon.

I found a quote somewhere that said Coburn produced the first ‘non-objective photography’, and I guess this is where he really hits the abstract.

October 6, 2007

What were the skies like..

Filed under: blurring, film, photography, polaroid, sea — caren80 @ 12:59 pm

What were the skies like.., originally uploaded by cath9.

when you were young?

Our local disused lighthouse, or reused I should say, which is currently a private residence on the market, and may soon become a B and B. If I could afford it I might well, but you might have to pay to have it moved if the front garden falls into the sea again.

Blog at WordPress.com.